site stats
Thursday, May 26, 2022
HomeLatest NewsMask Judge Accepts Granny Medina's Inheritance, But Won't Remove Crime of Rebellion...

Mask Judge Accepts Granny Medina’s Inheritance, But Won’t Remove Crime of Rebellion Yet

Mask judge Adolfo Carretero accepts Luis Medina’s proposal to include his grandmother’s estate in the court’s civil liability claim and will take it into account to drop the charge of concealing assets. However, the instructor warns that this “will come into effect when the amount of his inheritance rights, the judgment in which they are declared, and the part corresponding to Mr. Medina are officially registered in the procedure” will be recorded in the car dated May 5 this year . , which had access to.

Judge Carretero believes that when Medina’s proposal goes into effect, he will understand that “there is no intention to hide his assets”, that is, that he has no desire to hide his assets from the actions of justice. Carretero adds that he will use whatever part of the inheritance is needed to post bail, but warns that “the embargo will continue if the aforementioned judgment is overturned,” referring to the decision of the Seville court, which agrees with Medina in a family inheritance dispute.

Medina’s defense memo assured the court that offered the inheritance that it was “far in excess” of the €891,227.07 to be paid to the commissioner conducting the investigation following the seizure of his yacht and the €247 he held in an account. banking. In this regard, the statement of the judge himself in another ruling of April 29, where he emphasized that the bail imposed on the two defendants, Medina and Alberto Lucegno, since the civil liability is joint and several and that one will cover what is not enough, becomes relevant. to satisfy another.

Medina appealed against the charge of concealment of assets with the argument that the sale of the bonds attributed to him was carried out before the initiation of proceedings in the Instructional Court no. his complaints.

The judge reasoned as follows: “The party under investigation made his property orders before the process of foreseeable initiation, as it turned out, having nothing to do with the fact that after the embargo issued by this court, he did not issue any property order, for this reason His behavior is temporarily subject to the aforementioned crime of concealing assets.”


*The article has been translated based on the content of If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!


Most Popular

Recent Comments

%d bloggers like this: