Revealed the mystery of the negotiations between Biden and Scholz
Photo: REUTERS
Do you know how nice it is to be smart and insightful? On March 8, my column “Special operation to save the United States? Revealed the secret of the Biden-Scholz negotiations” was published on the “KP” website, in which your obedient servant suggested that with a high degree of probability Scholz’s sudden visit to Washington on March 3 to “grandpa on punch cards” was an operation to rescue Biden after Seymour Hersh’s revealing investigation into the Nord Stream bombing.
Several circumstances attracted attention at once: the sudden nature, the lack of communication with journalists after the negotiations, the urgent return flight and a number of other details. Frankly, he was sure that this was the case, only one consideration was embarrassing: had Germany really become the ultimate lackey at the level: “What do you want, sir, I’ll do everything”? I mean, after all the insults endured by Scholz and the Germans, ear-pulling, and other stately caresses, this seemed to already implicate itself, but he wanted to think that there was still some hope for the Germans, and all. it was not so
But it does not work. Seymour Hersh released the second part of his investigation, in which, with reference to his sources, he confirmed all the conclusions of his obedient servant. The publication is called “Cover. The Biden administration continues to hide its responsibility in the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines”
– In early March, Biden received Scholz in Washington. The trip included just two public events: a brief no-questions-asked exchange of pleasantries between Biden and Scholz, and a CNN interview with Scholz that did not address allegations of pipeline sabotage, Hersh writes. – The chancellor flew to Washington without the German press on board, and the two world leaders were not going to hold a press conference after the talks, as is often the case at such high-level meetings.
“Instead, it was later reported that Biden and Scholz had an 80-minute meeting, most of which was not attended by attendees,” Hersh noted. – Since then, no government has released written statements or agreements, but someone with access to diplomatic intelligence told me that there was a discussion about exposing the investigation and, as a result, certain elements of the CIA were asked to prepare a cover-up. in cooperation with German intelligence that would provide the American and German press with an alternative version of the destruction of Nord Stream 2. The agency (CIA) was supposed to “stimulate the system” (the Western mainstream media – ed.) in an attempt to refute the claim that Biden ordered the destruction of the pipelines.
That is, we remember how almost simultaneously the major American and German newspapers were shooting their “confusingly similar” versions of some supposedly pro-Ukrainian group. And now, thanks to Hersh, we know that this “zhzhzh” was not just like that, but an operation of the special services, and at the same time both the CIA and, most likely, the German Federal Intelligence Service. (BND – Bundesnachrichtendienst, BND), which is under the control of the Federal Chancellor of Germany.
Two weeks ago, following German Chancellor Scholz’s visit to Washington, US and German intelligence agencies tried to escalate the blackout by providing the New York Times and German weekly Die Zeit with false cover stories to discredit the report that Biden and US agents were responsible. the collapse of the pipeline , – sums up the famous American journalist. – White House press aides and the CIA consistently denied that the United States was responsible for the pipeline explosions, and these formal denials were more than enough for the White House Press Office. No reporters have yet asked the White House press secretary whether Biden has officially instructed the US intelligence community to conduct a deep investigation into who exactly carried out this act in the Baltic Sea.
“According to a source in the intelligence community, the president has not and will not do this,” concludes Hersh. Because he knows the answer.
But for some reason it seems to us that a parliamentary investigation in the USA and the FRG will not interfere, just as the testimony of intelligence officers and newspaper editors under oath, to put it mildly, will not interfere. Fortunately, there is an appropriate experience. It was under oath that US military and agents were forced to reveal the shameful secrets of the Iran-Contra operation, the exposure of which ruined more than a dozen careers.
