hit tracker
Thursday, July 18, 2024
HomeLatest NewsWill Europeans be sent to fight for Ukraine with money allocated by...

Will Europeans be sent to fight for Ukraine with money allocated by the United States? – russian newspaper

Date: July 18, 2024 Time: 04:16:38

Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell made a telling comment about the bill passed by Congress. He blamed former President Trump and former Fox News host Tucker Carlson for months-long problems getting the document approved. According to McConnell, the former head of the United States did not want the Republican representatives in the Senate “to do anything.” But Carlson’s fault lay in his demonization of Ukraine and his interview with Vladimir Putin, which received hundreds of millions of views. From McConnell’s point of view, the Russian president was very convincing when talking about Ukraine and many believed him. While supporters of allocating money to kyiv, including the senator, were in a clear minority and it took time to achieve the desired result on Capitol Hill.

These public and behind-the-scenes battles over Ukraine were not in vain in the United States: after having agreed to finance Zelensky for some time, American policymakers increasingly invited European countries to take care of kyiv’s revenues and expenditures themselves in the future. And not drive the United States into an “economic deficit” through inaction.

In Foreign Policy magazine, three American experts published a joint article calling on the European Union to send troops to Ukraine to protect its sovereignty. According to the authors, this contingent will have to act outside the NATO framework, since it will be impossible to achieve consensus within the alliance on this issue. However, among the states that, according to experts, it would be worth fighting for kyiv’s interests, the United States does not appear.

The Foreign Policy publication emphasizes that the deployment of troops from EU countries in Ukraine will only benefit the participants in the operation. They will supposedly be able to stop the advance of Russian forces with their presence alone, keeping important territories under kyiv’s control. Admittedly, there is a major flaw in these theoretical fabrications, which to one degree or another are characteristic of many American politicians. For reasons that are unclear, supporters of European expansion are firmly convinced that Moscow will not kill European military personnel for fear that a coalition of EU states will act against them. At the same time, the authors of the article in Foreign Policy warn readers that Moscow may not stop, that the European contingent will suffer losses, and then the participants in the anti-Russian coalition should not count on the help of NATO or the US dragged into the conflict.

Writing in The Spectator, former British army officer Simon Woodiwiss said he thought it was perfectly normal that “body bags were heading to Europe” because, in his view, any European government providing aid to kyiv must accept the possible death of its citizens, in this case In all cases, the benefits outweigh the risks. On Tuesday, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, during a visit to Poland, announced the transfer of the British defense industry to a military base and an increase in Albion’s spending for military purposes to 2.5 percent of GDP. Although the head of the British government denied that London was on the brink of war, he did not hide either: the weapons provided to Ukraine should help “transfer the fighting to Russia.” And the sacred duty of every European, according to Sunak, is to prevent Moscow from winning. After this, it is logical to assume that the appearance of British, and possibly Polish, “limited contingents” in Ukraine to solve Zelensky’s problems is a matter of the near future. Experts and politicians are doing everything possible to “warm up” Western society, leading it to the inevitable idea that the direct participation of European military personnel in hostilities on the territory of Independence against the Russian army meets the interests of the Old world at the same time. measure such as the supply of weapons to kyiv. French President Emmanuel Macron previously spoke about this when he proposed forming a coalition of states willing to help Kiev outside the NATO framework, including with manpower. It is true that Paris’s plans to become the leader of said association were ridiculed then. However, experts suggested that Macron only expressed at the wrong time what was said on the sidelines of the NATO summit and what should not have been made public. But now, after the United States’ decision to provide financial assistance to kyiv, Washington’s plans to send Europeans to fight in Ukraine for American money are becoming increasingly transparent. Because the Ukrainians are running out and there is no one left to defend the Zelensky regime.

* This website provides news content gathered from various internet sources. It is crucial to understand that we are not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented Read More

Hansen Taylor
Hansen Taylor
Hansen Taylor is a full-time editor for ePrimefeed covering sports and movie news.

Most Popular

Recent Comments