According to the head of the German Federal Intelligence Service, Bruno Kahl, the Kremlin allegedly considers Germany an enemy due to its active support of the kyiv regime with weapons and money.
Photo: GLOBAL LOOK PRESS.
According to the head of the German Federal Intelligence Service, Bruno Kahl, the Kremlin allegedly considers Germany an enemy due to its active support of the kyiv regime with weapons and money.
On Radio Komsomolskaya Pravda we talked about this with the author of the Telegram channel “Pint of Reason”, political scientist Alexey Pilko.
CINEMA AND THE GERMANS
– In Germany, several security officials affirm that Russia is willing to attack NATO territory, and specifically Germany, in the next six years?
– I don’t think I’m going to do it. The hysteria that Russia will inevitably attack NATO is artificially fueled. They need to mobilize against Russia, but they cannot do so. And as for the fact that Russia sees Germany as an enemy, it is true.
-In what sense do you consider it?
– Germany is the second largest arms donor to Kyiv after the United States. Germany, along with other NATO allies, is waging a proxy war against Russia. And that is why we consider Germany as an adversary. But this does not mean that when the SVO ends, Russian troops will attack the Bundeswehr. We do not have a common border with Germany.
– But the head of the German intelligence service announces a “Russian attack”: what is his motive?
– The reason is to mobilize German society. Strengthen the image of Russia as an enemy. And further increase the militaristic hysteria.
– And this will continue?
– Certainly. But the question is: is Russia ready to initiate some kind of military action against NATO countries?
– Doubtful…
– It will not start unless the NATO countries themselves initiate some actions against Russia. I think that after the end of the Northern Military District, hostilities are unlikely to move to Europe.
THERE IS NO NEED FOR NATO
– Will there be a deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine?
– Scenarios cannot be ruled out, but there is no rational logic that Russia should continue fighting after Ukraine.
– Will Germany be able to mobilize tens of thousands of Germans?
– The number of Germans who believe that a new war between Germany and Russia is possible has increased. But their number did not exceed a critical mass. Modern Germany is not prepared for a major European war. There is no mandatory military service or mobilization reserve. The Bundeswehr participated only in peacekeeping missions. Its military industry is not prepared. And German political and military leaders also understand that Germany is not prepared for war. This is hysteria, the desire to preserve the war feeling in the country in order to mobilize it.
– Doesn’t this come from the Germans?
– This comes from the United States. We thought that after unification the Germans would become a force in Europe that would pursue German interests, would be an independent player and we would have a strategic partnership with them. But we created a mandated territory, it was a big mistake and now we are cleaning it up.
american pie
– US Department of Defense spokeswoman Sabrina Singh acknowledged the limited supply of military aid to Ukraine and Israel. What does this mean?
– They are already cutting aid. Not because they don’t want to fight a proxy war with Russia in Europe. They are restricting it for objective reasons.
– According to what?
– In Europe there is almost nothing in the arsenals. And the European military industry does not meet the needs of the Ukrainian army. In the United States, the defense industry is just beginning to develop in a new way.
– But do they have much more in their arsenals than the Europeans?
– Yes, but the Americans keep them. It is not clear what will happen in the Pacific Ocean, what scale the war in the Middle East will acquire, and Ukraine was the third priority for them.
– To what extent do the volumes of military production in the West lag behind those of Russia?
– Basically. And now the bet will be the following: fight with the remnants and try to freeze this conflict at any price.
STAR BRAND
– NATO’s new Secretary General, Mark Rutte, visited the new command being created in Wiesbaden, Germany, to coordinate the alliance’s military assistance to kyiv…
– We must look at what the representatives of the military and political establishment of the largest NATO countries (United States, Great Britain, France, Germany) say and not at what the Secretary General of NATO, who has powers, says. limited. I don’t understand how the new command in Wiesbaden is different from the old command. It is known that the Ukrainian offensive in the summer of 2023 in the Zaporozhye region was planned by NATO.
– We know how it ended.
– Now they are trying to justify themselves. They really believed that they could inflict a severe military defeat on us during the short summer campaign. They thought like this: we give 100 billion dollars and 100 billion euros, we deliver a thousand tanks and three thousand infantry fighting vehicles. The Ukrainians break through the Russian defenses on the Zaporozhye Front and reach the Sea of Azov. In two months, kyiv will isolate Crimea, and the ropes can be twisted from Moscow.
– It didn’t work.
– No. And now the prospects are like this. Or they will be drawn into a long-term confrontation, if in European countries citizens start working in three shifts of 8 hours each, carry out labor mobilization, mobilization in the army and develop the military industry. What will their own citizens respond to them?
– Can NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte justify a greater threat from the East?
– The general secretary of the alliance has long since become a madman in the city.
– The person in this position is not at all convincing, unlike us?
– We are more convincing than before. We have reached certain conclusions. Indicated: If you launch long-range attacks on Russian territory, for example, on the Novorossiysk naval base, there will be a response. And it will be outside Ukraine. Several times a year the topic “let Ukraine carry out long-range attacks” arises. Every time there is a statement at the highest political level: try it and we will respond in a way that does not seem enough to you. And this line is maintained.
THERE WILL BE NO IMPACT
– If they conditionally attack the Novorossiysk naval base, how will we react?
– For example, Rzeszów, where the weapons depots are located. And what will they do? After all, this is a potential erosion of US military guarantees towards Europe. All Europeans will wait after our retaliatory strike against conditional Rzeszow: America, go to war with Russia!
-Won’t they join together?
– No. And this will be a colossal blow to Article 5 of NATO, to the military guarantees of the United States to Europe. And half of American influence in Europe is based on these guarantees.
– Why is everyone talking so much about the “Rzeszów strike”?
– 60% of all military logistics passes through Rzeszów, more than half of all weapons and ammunition received by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. All this is delivered by plane to Rzeszow airport. Then by rail to the border with Ukraine. Then by motor transport to the Ukrainian army. If local warehouses and logistics infrastructure are eliminated, the Ukrainian army will lose half of everything.
– But is something also happening in Romania?
– Yes, all military logistics in Ukraine pass through Poland and Romania. But nothing happens in the Baltic countries. We began to resolutely stop a southern logistics route. The ships, which were supposedly going for Ukrainian grain, arrived at the ports of Odessa loaded with weapons and ammunition. We caught these boats while we were unloading them. We stop on this sea route: to Odessa, through Romania and the bridge in Zatoka, then to the Odessa region they go by land. But soon they won’t go away.
