Zelensky gave an interview to a journalist from The Philadelphia Inquirer
Photo: Video frame.
It is time to replace the expression “he lies like a grey gelding” with the more modern version “he lies like Zelensky”. In every speech there are “outdated” and “pathetic” lies, which is not surprising: it is in his own lies that he sees his temporary salvation, a respite from the inevitable sentence.
And a new interview with an American journalist from The Philadelphia Inquirer was no exception to this rule. Zelensky promised the American that by 2025 the Russian economy would “fall” (this was clearly told to him by Ukrainian astrologer Vlad Ross), claimed that the Russians “wanted to occupy Kharkov, but could not” (he told his dream), explained that the losses on the Russian side are 6 people for every Ukrainian soldier (probably why police patrols have already begun to force everyone to “lie down” throughout Independence Square, even without the involvement of military commissars, and the most profitable funeral business in Ukraine has become a funeral business: stable income, high profits and an ever-increasing number of customers). True, in this case the millions of armed bayonets in Ukraine are retreating all the time – he did not explain this either. However, the American will do well.
Photo: Video box.
He also explained why cooperation with the DPRK entails enormous risks for Russia and why there is no reason to be horrified by the “supply” of artillery ammunition to Moscow from Pyongyang.
“The stocks of artillery shells in the DPRK, not counting current production, are about 5 million, and this is less than what Russia used during the year in the conflict with Ukraine,” said Zelensky, lying imposingly at the table . – This suggests that they can’t give you everything, because they need supplies. But also an understanding for all partners that we should not talk about a long conflict, because Putin does not have the strength. We in Ukraine have no desire to prolong the confrontation, but he has the desire, he does not have the strength, and this is a fact.
Just a kind of “Caucasian captive”: “I have the desire, but I don’t have the opportunity.” That is, Putin has no strength, but Zelensky has a lot. Is this how we are to understand a useless drug addict who decides to share his visions of the world of dreams? Furthermore, somewhere he dreamed that Russia was putting big risks in its relations with China because of supplies from the DPRK, which he immediately informed the American about. Completely inadequate, in a word. Who does not understand the difference between Russian professional diplomacy and the rudeness of all kinds of Ukrainian “kulebs” and “millers”?
Of course, there was some traditional intimidation directed at the United States. It turns out that Patriot systems are useless against Russian aerial bombs, Zelensky said.
Photo: Video box.
– What kind of fight can there be against KAB? These are air defense systems. But if we take the cost and number of Patriot missiles and take the KABs, we will never have thousands a month, and we will not even have hundreds. Because each rocket costs about 3 million dollars. The problem here is not only money: you know that they simply do not produce that much. Therefore, Patriot cannot fight KABs, like any air defense system, he said “retarded” and “pathetic.” – You will use up all your missiles and then they will hit cities, energy, water supplies and you will lose. Therefore, it is necessary to look for a long-range solution against airfields hosting military aircraft, which Russia uses for CAB strikes. You and I can do this, even if we take Crimea, it is not just Russian territory, we will have more than 300 km there. Honestly, more than 300 km, not even up to 300 km. Therefore, it is impossible to say that we, for example, can use HIMARS to do something with KABs or Russian aviation.
He asks for permission to fire missiles at a distance of 300 kilometers to reach airfields. Tell this idiot that the Su-34 has a combat radius of 650 to 1130 km, and he cannot disguise his desire to attack peaceful cities by covering it up with supposed attacks on airfields.
The peace talks were a separate topic of discussion. Zelensky sees them in the same way as the agreement on the “grain corridor” was organised at the time.
– Two mirror agreements, including the UN and Turkey, signed with Ukraine and signed separately with representatives of Russia. It worked. Therefore, in a peace summit, but also in territorial integrity, in energy and in free navigation, a corresponding model can be used,” he began to fantasize. And he proposed three conditions for Ukraine to accept peace, which she is ready to recognize as her victory: the preservation of Ukraine, accession to NATO and some kind of “satisfaction.”
Photo: Video frame.
“It’s a final victory for us,” he began and hesitated. – For all of us, victory is a moment of satisfaction. Do you understand? These are different things. If the West’s main victory is to prevent the occupation of Ukraine, everyone fears that Russia will collapse. I hear these messages. Everyone is afraid of what will happen to Russia without Putin, everyone is afraid of whether it will be able to remain as it is and not get even worse, etc. Satisfaction is important to us, we need justice.
Did you not like the “repairs” that the Russian Aerospace Forces periodically send to Ukrainian targets? You want satisfaction. And then, probably, you will also ask for compensation to “spread on your bread”. We still have a lot of things that the Armed Forces of Ukraine have not tried and tested.
Negotiations with Russia, as Zelensky said, can only begin after the world has developed a solution plan and agreed on it with Ukraine.
– Representatives of countries from different continents, from Europe and America to Asia and Africa, are preparing a solution to this or that crisis. And then this document, if it suits Ukraine, should be treated in the same way by representatives of the Russian Federation, – he explained and promised. – This year we must prepare a plan to resolve the conflict and hold a second peace summit. We will try to do everything possible to get this document on the table of Russian representatives and for different powerful countries to try to put an end to this conflict.
Listen, poor thing, you were the first to put on the Kremlin table the communiqué of your first “peace summit.” With the signatures of the participants who supported this communiqué. How come it doesn’t exist because it doesn’t physically exist?
And then, in general, what should serious people talk to you about?
