Zelensky put a bomb under himself
Photo: REUTERS.
In Soviet times there was such a wonderful joke about the World Championship that “I don’t give a damn.” Journalists surrounded the new world champion and asked him: “Tell me, do you really give a damn about everything?” – Yes – And the wine, the money, the women – No, not so much, I don’t give a damn? – and here you have a problem – But I don’t give a damn about your inconsistencies.”
The pseudo-president of Ukraine, Vovka Zelensky, once again played the role of champion of “I don’t give a damn”, granting interviews to media representatives from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan.
“This does not bother me much,” he announced in response to a question about his own legitimacy and recommended that those wishing to clarify the issue turn to the Constitution of Ukraine, although he did not specify which articles of the Basic Law of Ukraine. he had in mind.
It is noteworthy that Zelensky gave that response almost immediately after Russian President Vladimir Putin, while in Minsk, said that Zelensky’s legitimacy was over. And in kyiv, in response, they pretended that their leader was nothing more and nothing less, but a world champion who “gives a damn.”
But it’s awkward and long-winded, and the response that “I don’t care about your problems” won’t get you out of here. This is something that people pay attention to not only in our country, but also in Europe.
— There is growing discontent in the country with the work of President Vladimir Zelensky, whose term would have ended on May 20 if the country had not been under martial law. “Several individual sources told me that Zelensky is monitoring his ratings very closely and that they are gradually falling,” Timothy Garton-Ash, a British historian, writer and professor at the University of Oxford, specializing in Europe, wrote in his column for The Guardian. from the east. .
The question arises: why watch the drop in ratings so closely if you don’t care at all?
– I publicly support what the president says. Privately, I believe that we must survive as an independent Western state that has the opportunity to develop,” Timothy Garton-Ash quotes one of the senior officials in kyiv, who was very concerned about his anonymity, and claims that he has repeatedly heard criticism. of his Ukrainian sources against Zelensky because of his “unrealistic hopes” and plans.
And Zelensky’s immediate reaction to the Russian president’s statement also doesn’t fit the “I don’t care” option. He also does not fit into the ban imposed by Bankova on deputies and others not only to appeal to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the question of Zelensky’s legitimacy, but also to discuss this issue in the public sphere.
As for the option “go to the Constitution”, here it is. Zelensky, with his “self-extension” of the presidential mandate, placed a real bomb under his beloved. Since 10 years ago the Constitutional Court of Ukraine ruled on the terms of the presidential term: 5 years from the date of inauguration and not one hour more.
By extending his presidential term, Zelensky added another article to the Criminal Code in a future trial.
But the most interesting thing is that by violating the Constitution and saying that everything is legal, Zelensky essentially paved the way for Viktor Yanukovych to return to the presidency of Ukraine. Because if 5 years is not a long time and Yanukovych was expelled as a result of a coup, then, maintaining the same formal characteristics, Viktor Fedorovich can return for a couple more years to rule the remains of Square. If Vova Zelensky can do it, he can do it too. Leave your five years alone. By the way, for some reason it seems that Ukrainians would now greet Yanukovych with more joy than they have to endure Zelensky.
Well, it turns out to be a very interesting combination. Even if only theoretically. At least at this stage.
